Title:
Robustness comparison of bow-tie and dipole antennas
Author(s):
T. Olsson, J. Siden and A. Koptioug
Source:
IEE Proc.-Microw. Antennas Propag.
Vol./Issue/Date:
Vol. 151, No. 6, December
Year:
2004
Page(s):
525-529
Keywords:
Abstract:
The paper describes the application of a computer intensive methodology to evaluate
antenna susceptibility to random physical damage for a dipole and a bow-tie antenna. For each
randomly generated damage pattern antenna parameters are simulated and a statistical comparison
is performed. Computer intensive statistical methods like the Bootstrap, used here for
postprocessing, make fewer initial assumptions than classical statistical methods when modelling
a problem, and are robust against small deflections from these assumptions. The bias-corrected and
accelerated (BCa) Bootstrap method is used for confidence interval estimates. The dipole antenna is
found to be more robust to numbers of small (B100th of a wavelength) circular holes penetrating
the structure than the bow-tie antenna.
Document:
Reference Id:
98
Back to References
Please note that this is a collection of external publications.
CST respects the copyrights of the respective owners and as such can not distribute said publications.
Details of copyright ownership is provided to the best of our knowledge. Please contact the given references for further information.