CST

Electron Gun for Lithography Applications

Electron guns are not only necessary for obvious applications as particle accelerators or vacuum tubes. Electron guns are also used in many applications in the area of electronics - for example, in electron microscopes, electron beam lithography or printed electronics. In the latter, the electron beam is used for sintering the printed circuit on temperature-sensitive, flexible substrates.

The electron gun in these applications typically has to provide a high brightness beam with round cross section. Thus, engineers are interested in any deterioration of the beam path due to field disturbances. In addition, secondary electrons can be produced when the beam hits an object, and these are also of interest.

The electron gun used to illustrate the simulation in this article is derived from [1] and shown in figure 1.


Structure of the electron gun
Figure 1: Structure of the electron gun

The particle emission will happen from the tip of the field emitter (see figure 2, left). The emission settings could be either space charge limited or field dependent emission. In order to extract and accelerate the particles, electrostatic potentials are applied (figure 2, right). The potential of the suppressor is slightly more negative than the potential of the field emitter tip, such that the beam is focused.


Particle emission (left) and electro static potential (right) of the electron gun setup.
Figure 2: Particle emission (left) and electro static potential (right) of the electron gun setup.

The particle tracking solver of CST PARTICLE STUDIO® (CST PS) directly calculates the resulting potential and particle beam trajectory as shown in figure 3.


Electro static potential (left) and beam trajectory (right).
Figure 3: Electro static potential (left) and beam trajectory (right).

As we can see from the beam trajectory (figure 3, right), the beam would widen up with the configuration as described so far. This is certainly not wanted when dealing with high brightness. In order to improve the situation, an external B-field can be applied. For simplicity reasons a constant field was used here, but also complex 3D fields could be applied. These 3D fields could be loaded from an additional CST EM STUDIO® (CST EMS) simulation or from measurement data provided in a text file. After adding a constant field, the beam trajectory looks much sharper than before (see figure 4, right).


Trajectory without additional B field (left) and with additional constant B field of 0.15 T in direction of the beam propagation (right).
Figure 4: Trajectory without additional B field (left) and with additional constant B field of 0.15 T in direction of the beam propagation (right).

There is one thing very important for such a simulation: The mesh in the vicinity of the emission has to be fine enough to provide a good field distribution and thus correct particle emission. That means, no matter if hexahedral or tetrahedral mesh is used, the mesh has to be inspected before. Typical meshes are shown in figure 5.


Hexahedral (left) and tetrahedral (right) mesh, which could be used for such a simulation.
Figure 5: Hexahedral (left) and tetrahedral (right) mesh, which could be used for such a simulation.

The brightness, which is defined as current density per solid angle, can be evaluated from the particle current density plot in combination with the template based post processing. The template based post processing will give a 1D curve of the particle current density, which gives the radius of the spot and the average current density (see also figure 6). For this specific electron gun this yields 3.67 107 A/m2/sr considering a spot radius of 0.0835 mm at a distance of 8.365 mm. The average current density is 12000 A/m2.


Particle current density in 3D and evaluated by the template based post processing.
Figure 6: Particle current density in 3D and evaluated by the template based post processing.

A beam which collides with a substrate surface may release secondary electrons. The resulting secondary electrons will be recorded in the detector of the scanning electron microscope. Or, they might limit the resolution of e-beam lithography. Thus, the behavior of the secondary electrons is of interest and can be examined in a second step. In order to illustrate the principle of such a simulation a simplified example is used (see figure 7).


Simplified example for secondary electron analysis.
Figure 7: Simplified example for secondary electron analysis.

The release of secondaries depends on the material and the beam energy. The material properties are characterized by the secondary emission yield (SEY) in CST PS. The electron gun is replaced by a simplified electron beam emission with fixed current and beam velocity. This beam is shot onto the substrate's surface. The released secondary electrons are shown in the trajectory (see figure 8) and are recorded by the collision info of CST PS for each of the collector objects.


Primary and secondary electron trajectory of a DC electron beam shot onto a substrate's surface.
Figure 8: Primary and secondary electron trajectory of a DC electron beam shot onto a substrate's surface.

This article shows the principle of an electron gun simulation for electron beam lithography or electron microscopes. The simulation can be entirely performed with the tracking solver of CST PS, which gives the particle trajectory. Derived values as brightness or secondary emitted current can be evaluated in the post processing templates or by using appropriate material properties. Simulation is an easy way to gain some insights into the behavior, which becomes especially valuable for non-symmetric electron guns.

References

[1] Shin Fujita, "A new practical approach to evaluation of electron gun properties", Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Charged Particle Optics 18-19th
September, 2003


CST Article "Electron Gun for Lithography Applications"
last modified 8. Nov 2016 1:50
printed 20. Feb 2017 9:37, Article ID 1128
URL:

All rights reserved.
Without prior written permission of CST, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any method, be stored or transferred into an electronic data processing system, neither mechanical or by any other method.

Feedback

1 of 2 people found this article useful

Did you find this article useful?

Other Articles

Photonic Band Gap Structure for a Particle Accelerator

Photonic Band Gap Structure for a Particle Accelerator
This application has been succesfully simulated using the powerful Eigenmode Solver in CST MICROWAVE STUDIO® with the aid of the Modal Analysis Module. Read full article..

Magnetron and Microwave Oven Design to Solve Wi-Fi - Interference Issues

Magnetron and Microwave Oven Design to Solve Wi-Fi - Interference Issues
This article describes how the different modules of CST STUDIO SUITE® can be used to aid the complete path of a magnetron and microwave oven design. Starting from the analysis of the interaction region in CST PARTICLE STUDIO®, continuing with the electrostatic and magnetostaic field evaluation in CST EM STUDIO®, further evaluating the field distributions inside the oven in CST MICROWAVE STUDIO® and finally leading to a temperature and deformation investigation in CST MPHYSICS STUDIO®. Read full article..

Multiphysics Simulation Medical Applications

Multiphysics Simulation Medical Applications
This webinar will introduce the basics of bio-EM simulations, such as the available body models, the choice of numerical solver and relevant post-processing quantities, as well as advanced workflows for multi-channel systems including EM/circuit co-simulation and some HPC aspects. Finally, the tight coupling of the EM solvers with the advanced bio-heat solvers including human thermo-regulation and spin response solvers for MRI imaging will be covered. All steps will be demonstrated with state-of-the-art examples from applications areas like ultra-high-field MRI, implant safety, microwave imaging, hyperthermia, pacemakers, etc. Read full article..

Vivaldi Antenna

Vivaldi Antenna
Microwave Engineering Europe's (MWEE) EM simulation benchmark has become quite a tradition over the last few years, enticing some of the best known software providers to put their diverse simulation methods to the test. Read full article..

CST PARTICLE STUDIO Simulation of a Depressed Collector

CST PARTICLE STUDIO Simulation of a Depressed Collector
A multi-stage depressed collector for the "Rijnhuizen" Fusion Free-Electron Maser (FEM) is simulated with CST PARTICLE STUDIO™. The results are reproduced with permission of Pulsar Physics. See also M.J. de Loos, S.B. van der Geer, Pulsar Physics, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B, Vol 139, 1997. Read full article..
Back Back  

Your session has expired. Redirecting you to the login page...