Whenever a plane wave propagating along a region 1 with intrinsic impedance
The general approach to retrieve the scattering parameters consists of mode matching techniques, which in general can be obtained by imposing the continuity of the tangential components of the fields at the interface of both media.
This is a very simple model in which a plane wave (generated using waveguide ports) with linear polarization travels through a volume of air divided by a dielectric slab, as shown in Fig. 3. The permittivity of the dielectric is parameterized to allow the reflection coefficient to be calculated for a range of different scenarios. The model is simulated with the frequency domain solver at a frequency of 1 GHz.
In Fig. 4 we show – for a fixed frequency – the dependence of the reflection coefficient (linear) on the permittivity of the dielectric substrate with thickness
The solid line represents the analytical solution obtained from solving the scattering problem and the discrete symbols are obtained using CST STUDIO SUITE Student Edition. As can be seen, there is excellent agreement between CST STUDIO SUITE and the analytical formula. It can be seen that the reflection hits a null several times at resonances, and the obtained curve has a “growing-sinusoidal” behavior i.e. as permittivity increases the maximum value of each sinusoid gets closer to 1, which means the reflection peaks also get bigger. This happens because as permittivity increases, the mismatch between the intrinsic impedance of free-space and the dielectric gets bigger, therefore the adaptation is worse and we have greater reflection.
Fig. 5 shows a carpet plot of the real part of the y-component of the magnetic field along the whole system. This carpet plot is obtained for a case in which the permittivity of the slab is 4. This corresponds to one of the nulls in the reflection coefficient, and so reflection is zero and the amplitude is the same on either side of the slab.
Fig. 6 shows the carpet plot is shown for the case at which the permittivity is 10. As seen in Fig. 4, the reflection for this permittivity value is nearly 0.78, so the transmission is clearly affected.