CST – Computer Simulation Technology

Electromagnetic Simulation of a Switched Reluctance Motor

A Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) can be optimized on two fronts: the magnet design itself and the dynamic performance.

Such a motor can be easily simulated with parametric magnetostatic solutions using either the CST EM STUDIO® (CST EMS) 2D or 3D magnetostatic solvers. Only a single 3D model is required for both types of simulation ensuring that the geometry, excitation, materials and boundary conditions are consistent between the 2D and 3D models. The user merely has to specify the cut-plane in the 3D model on which the 2D simulation should be performed. Full parametric and post-processing capabilities are defined independent of the solver choice. This allows the user to, for example, perform rapid 2D parametric analyses and obtain end-effect correction factors from a 3D simulation for the same model. ...



Figure 1: 3D Geometry of the 6/4 SRM

An example of a 6/4 SRM is shown in figure 1 which was rapidly constructed in CST EMS. Non-linear materials have been defined for both the stator and rotor components. Although three coil pairs have been defined, only one pair needs to be excited for the simulations due to the symmetric properties of the motor.



Figure 2: Flux lines superimposed on mesh view for unaligned rotor position

Figure 2 shows the flux lines, vector potential, for the unaligned rotor position from the 2D solution.

Such a reluctance machine is controlled by, for example, an asymmetric bridge converter. For a dynamic simulation, it is important to extract specific quantities from the parametric data in look-up table form. Torque, flux-linkage and co-energy amongst other data can be automatically exported as functions of angular displacement, current and other user-defined parameters.



Figure 3: Flux Linkage (Wb) as a function of coil current (A) and rotor position (degrees)

The results from a parametric sweep of flux linkage as a function of current and angular displacement are shown in Figure 3. The aligned position corresponds to zero degrees.



Figure 4: Torque (Nm) as a function of coil current (A) and rotor position (degrees)

The results from a parametric sweep of torque as a function of current and angular displacement are shown in Figure 4. Again, the aligned position corresponds to zero degrees.

In addition to the parametric analysis, optimization of the magnetic performance of the motor can be performed using the built-in optimizer. Parameters such as the stator and rotor pole widths can be optimized to reduce the peak flux density and increase the mechanical stiffness. Tapering of the pole edges can be applied to the model, the level of which can be optimized to reduce the harmonics in the torque waveforms.

Rate this Article

0 of 5 Stars
5 Stars
0%
4 Stars
0%
3 Stars
0%
2 Stars
0%
1 Stars
0%
contact support

Your session has expired. Redirecting you to the login page...

We use cookie to operate this website, improve its usability, personalize your experience, and track visits. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to use of cookies. You have the possibility to manage the parameters and choose whether to accept certain cookies while on the site. For more information, please read our updated privacy policy


Cookie Management

When you browse our website, cookies are enabled by default and data may be read or stored locally on your device. You can set your preferences below:


Functional cookies

These cookies enable additional functionality like saving preferences, allowing social interactions and analyzing usage for site optimization.


Advertising cookies

These cookies enable us and third parties to serve ads that are relevant to your interests.